|
JerkyFlea: March 2000 |
| Author: JerkyFlea |
|
Date: March 2000 |
Fleamail (cont')
Next we have an
interesting letter from Amy G.. Only
celebrity related in a general sense, but definitely
should spark some discussion (with my comments once again
in black italics)...
JerkyFlea- I have to say something!
I am one of those people with naturally curly
hair. And I don't mean wavy hair like Faith
Hill, and Nicole Kidman. I mean CURLY, exactly
like
KERI RUSSELL's.
Through the years I have grown to absolutely despise
curly hair, and not just my own. I find myself
looking at celebs with curly tresses going what's
with all the fuss? What is so stinking great
about curly hair? After owning a full head of
it for 22 years now, I have come to the distinct
conclusion - Absolutely nothing!
While
I respect your opinion, I think curly hair is what
you make of it. It obviously takes
significantly more effort to style and control than
straight hair, and you aren't the first to decide
that the hassle isn't worth it and cut it off into a
more manageable style.
You
are, however, one of the few that I've heard that has
expanded their disdain for their own curly hair to
include ALL curly hair. Though I'm a bit biased
due to my affinity for curly hair, I still don't
understand how you can say the beauty of the Kim
Delaneys and Julianna Marguiles of the world isn't
enhanced by their curls.
About
two years ago, I myself cut my hair just as short, if
not shorter that Keri's is now. It was so much
easier to take care of, and didn't look to shabby
either (my husband met and fell in
love with me that way) We met kind of on a
blind date. When he asked my friend what I
looked like before he met me, she told him that I was
really cute, but that I had really short hair.
(AHHH! the constant stigma - even from women, about
that horrible short hair) He told her that if a
woman can look cute with really short hair, then
she is truly a beautiful woman.
What
a good guy your hubby must be. I would agree
that it is the rare woman who can look good in
virtually any hairstyle, such as Madonna. And I
would guess your friend pointed out your hairstyle
because some guys do have more of a hair length
preference than others. A fair warning for a
blind date. Just be glad she didn't say you had
a great personality. =)
When
people are commenting on Keri's
"horrible" hair, they need to take into
consideration the hassle long, kinky, prone to frizz
and damage curly hair truly is. Unless you have
it naturally, you would never understand. I
think Keri's cut looks great on her. She is a
beautiful woman with long hair, or short. Sorry
for the length, but someone's got to stick up for us
fluff heads!
Again, while I
respect you opinion, I really don't think Keri's cut
looks good and it doesn't necessarily have anything
to do with the way she wore her hair
previously. Given her round face, a super short
head hugging style isn't the most flattering look for
her. Now that she's grown it out a bit with a
little
more fullness on the top and back, with more length
below the chin, it's starting to look more
balanced. I don't necessarily think she needs
to grow it back out to the mane she had before
(which, I have to say, did look good), but she could
stay short with a more flattering style than the one
she chose.
To your point that
I and others "...need to take into consideration
the hassle long, kinky, prone to frizz and damage
curly hair truly is", I'd point out that Keri
had always worn her curls between waist and
shoulder-length before she got the recent cut.
So, if she hated it that much, she would have
probably cut it long before now.
And finally, as
for sticking up for the "fluff heads", I'd
say there are more than a few folks at www.NaturallyCurly.com that would, uh, disagree
with your opinions on curly hair. =)
vvv
Next,
that moment I'm sure you've been waiting for: excerpts
from the monthly review of my column by Andy S. (with
my comments in, of all things, black italics):
Flea! Alright,
I admit it, you had me a little panicked.
Because your column has become something of a tonic
to me. A monthly lifeline which dispenses no
healing medicines, but without which, nevertheless, I
cannot live. Well, I can live, but it is a
hollow existence. All this, and you're not even
a woman. Or so you say.
Ah, just think of me as
your celebrity hair methadone. And, as for the
not being a woman thing, apparently I need to go even
further and explain that I'm not gay or a
transvestite. That latter one is from The
National Enquirer. Seriously. And don't
ask, it's sadly idiotic on their part.
Days went by,
weeks perhaps, and the new column didn't
appear. And so it was that I practically
STORMED to your site today, determined that if the
new column wasn't posted, I would start sending you
e-mails requesting its presence, which would start
friendly, but become increasingly filled with virtiol
if the new column still didn't appear. Thank
goodness it didn't come to that, and I have some
vitriol saved for next time (I keep it in the
medicine cabinet where the cat can't reach it)
Hey have you tried the
generic brand of vitriol yet? Just as good and
much cheaper. Good to know if you suffer from
frequent rantings.
Not only that,
but watch me blush as I discover my own words posted
for all to enjoy! Oh, Flea, the sheer glory of
knowing that the uneducated masses will benefit from
the crumbs of wisdom I toss them. I was walking
on sunshine all day. People who passed me in
the street politely did not stare, but I know they
were studying me intensely, trying to figure out how
I could possess such insights that they, in their
nasty, brutish, and short lives, would never
enjoy. Sucks to be one of the masses.
Yup, sure does. Glad
I could elevate you above the rabble, if just for a
brief instant. The view's nice. Hey, I
can see my house from here...
Alright then,
to the hair news. February has become another
gloomy month, as talented people with the finances to
employ every top-notch stylist, roller, and
extra-hold gel continue to make mind-bogglingly dumb
hair decisions. It just shouldn't be this
complicated. Let's dig in:
TERI
HATCHER: I'm a big Teri fan. I'm a big curls fan.
And yet that shot of Teri with curls plopped on her
head just misses the mark, real wide. Two great
tastes that should taste great together, but
don't. Maybe they're great tastes that should
forever stay separate, like chocolate and beer
(although I could go for a Hershey's Amber right
now). Have to ponder this one more.
Actually, I've had a
chocolate based beer and it's pretty good.
Doesn't change the fact that Teri's hair looks like
some bad hairstyle experiment gone a wry. You
know, like after attaching the electrodes and
shocking it to life, it climbed on to Teri's head and
died. However, before it passed on, it seems to
have eaten most of her eyebrows. Tragic.
CATE
BLANCHETT: Are you sure this isn't Tori
Amos in bad lighting? Cause I'm just a tad suspicious. For the
eight zillionth time, people, parted in the middle
with little flippy things at the bottom makes you
look, at best, like you're 4 years old. If
you're a movie star of Cate's caliber, you should be
sporting something a little more refined.
Very true. And good
call on the Tori Amos thing. Good connection
that I didn't see. You are learning well,
grasshopper.
Oh, and just to interject a
response to Ally from a post she put on the column's
message board, the reason Cate's below below the chin
layers don't work with her round face is because
since it is a shag, the length that would offset them
is farther back. Thus, the front layers just end at
her chin, giving the same unflatting look a
chin-length bob would give. So there you are.
ALICIA
SILVERSTONE: Congratulations, Alicia. You are now
officially twelve years old. Once again, people, let's read
aloud from page 57 in our hymnals: getting bangs does not relieve
you from keeping an actual STYLE. One of the few cases in my
personal history where I've strongly preferred the no-bangs,
parted-in-the-middle deal. Alicia, I wanted you when you were
young enough to send me to jail. Now you're old enough, and
you look young enough to turn me off altogether. I may have to
start a seminar or something.
Even after finding the
better picture that's in the Updates
section, I must say that it looks just as bad.
Unless this is for a movie (and even if it was, why
not glam it up for a premiere?), this has to be one
of the worst style changes in a while without any
major loss of length.
SHARON
STONE: Um, no.
Well, on the upside, she's
still letting it grow. From the front it looks
really good, but the sides and back (especially the
back) just don't. Maybe she should start
wearing a lot of hooded coats.
Alright,
FleaMan, I'm going to end my latest dissertation for
now, so we can all get on with our lives, such as
they are (actually, Will & Grace is on).
Must go watch Debra
Messing. I can sympathize. Woohoo!
But thank you
again for printing my letter. If you ever dare
to do so again, don't hesitate to mention that I'm
good-looking, modest single young man in Los Angeles,
desperate for a woman with great hair. I even
have all of my own hair. And I never use a
flowbee!
Consider it done. And what
more could a girl want? Other than a guy
wouldn't be secretly and obsessively critiquing her
hair every moment?
Oh, and for those of you scoring at
home, I believe that is a new record for Flowbee
references in a column.
vvv
And finally a
couple of general comments on the column from opposite
ends of the spectrum. First, a compliment:
Lord I loved
the Jan/Feb column. I expected to laugh,
maybe even chuckle, but I surprised myself by
downright guffawing a couple times. Yeah, I'm not
really sure what a guffaw is either, but I'm pretty
sure I did it. Thanks for the entertainment! -------
Amy G
Thanks Amy. Actually, my favorite
part of this email was it's title: "Praise
Lavishing". Next, I present my first official piece
of outright hate mail. Ok, the first that's related to
the column:
Um yeah i went
into your column thinking i would find information on
a haircut that would be right for me instead i found
you . A superficial column that criticizes everyone
and everything. PS you should seriously consider
getting a life outside celebrities. ----
Ralph C (or Mrs. C)
Uh...ow. You are right that
the very nature of the column is superficial, since it
focuses on something as trivial as hair...and celebrity
hair, at that. Can't defend that at all.
However, I would take exception that I'm critical of
everyone and everything. I'm pretty sure there are
several compliments in there as well. Let me look
at last month's column. Yup, there are positive
comments on Eileen Davidson, Bonnie Hunt, and Peta
Wilson, just to name a few. So, I'm not completely
cranky and cynical, with emphasis on
"completely".
Oh, and if I didn't have a life,
then the column would be on time. =)
vvv
Want to tell me how much you love
the column? OK, how about hate? Have comment
on something I wrote? Just want to see if you are
up to the challenge of writing something that will pass
the rigid Fleamail screening process and make it
into the next column?
Drop me a line at [email protected].
Keri Russell and Cate
Blanchett pictures courtesy Reuters, Teri Hatcher picture
courtesy Teri.Net
Next Page >>> |