It's odd how things work
out sometimes. For example, I
was running a bit behind on this month's column (big
surprise) because it's a little larger than usual.
However, had I not been late, I would have put it up too
early to catch a couple of the items on which I report
this month, including one of the bigger ones. So, the
fact that you had to wait this long for a new issue of
the column is actually a good thing.Not buying it, are ya?
Be that as it may, there is a bunch
of good stuff this month and lots of pictures. Though
there is no special section on either, but there are some
tidbits from both the Grammies and SAG Awards scattered
throughout the column. And, before you ask, no, I have no
idea what movie role would require Helen Hunt to dye her
hair white and put it in those bizarre braids. The movie
version of "Xena: Albino Princess" maybe? But I
digress.
Anyway, this thing is long enough
without my mindless babbling in the introduction. On to
the mindless babbling in the column...
Updates
BRITNEY SPEARS' hair has become my version of the "Who Wants To Marry A
Multi-Millionare?"
fiasco. I really don't want to keep reporting on
it, but stuff keeps happening that I feel like I
need to pass along. I mean, I'm just as
disinterested in the fact that Britney has gotten another
slightly shorter cut as I am that Bob Guccione is trying
to get Darva Conger to pose for Penthouse,
but just as "Entertainment Tonight" feels obligated to report on the
latter, I feel required to report on the former.
Oh, well, them's the breaks. So, to fulfill my duty
to you, the faithful reader, I must report that Britney
has cut off another couple of inches to bring her 'do up
to a legitimate chin-length bob. And, before you
ask, yes, those were, once again, extensions she wore at
the Grammys. Still wondering why this whole
extension thing is starting to drive me nuts?
 |
 |
 |
| Before
|
The REAL After
|
The
"extended" After |
FLEA'S CALL: Ok, Britney's bob doesn't look
bad, but I don't think that's the issue here. My
question is why the heck did she do it? I mean she
had it cut shorter just a few days before the Grammies only to wear extensions to the awards to simulate the
long hair she had a few months ago before she started
slowly going shorter. Everyone else that's wearing
extensions is doing it to either jump ahead in the growth
process or to have long hair for a bit while retaining
their current style. Britney is literally the only
person I can think of that keeps wearing extensions as
she goes shorter. I truly don't get it.
Anyone know what I must be missing here?
vvv
Speaking of
extensions, CHARLIZE THERON has jumped on the bandwagon as well.
Charlize, who has been growing her hair back since going
ultra short to a pixie a year or so ago, has, in
reality, grown her re-blonded tresses back to a
chin-length, layered bob. However, that apparently
wasn't long enough, so either for personal reasons or a
movie role she has added another foot of hair in the form
of extensions. Charlize now has (say it with me),
stick-straight, center-parted, long hair with wispy ends
that falls about six inches below her shoulders.
She has however, in a break from convention, retained her
bangs, which now cover her eyebrows.
 |
 |
| Her real hair
|
Her
"extended" hair |
FLEA'S CALL: I think you know what I'm going to write
here, don't you? Let's see if you are right.
Look at the "before" picture and now look at
the "after". Do you believe I'll say: A)
The bob looked terrific on her and there seems to be no
rational reason that she needed to get extensions B) The
new longer hair is sleek, fashionable, and complimentary
or C) She looked best with either the red shag she had in
"Reindeer
Games" or the brunette bob
with baby bangs whe wore last Fall. If you answered
"A", then you are indeed a loyal reader and/or
have a fine and discerning taste in hairstyles. If
you answered "B", you either haven't been
paying attention, have been brainwashed by the fashion
magazines, or have a broken link to the second picture
and are just making a guess. And, if you answered
"C", you should probably just skim the rest of
the column because I know your Internet time is pretty
limited there at the hospital.
vvv
Finally, an update
with some good news and it comes, amazingly enough, in
the form of HOLLY HUNTER.
As longtime readers know, I've been hounding Holly since
she went for an ill-advised short cut about a year
ago. Not that Holly can't wear short hair, but her
'do back then was a hacked mess. Fortunately, not
too long after that, she did start letting it grow.
Now, it has grown back to shoulder-length in a long
shagish style, though the layers are quite long and
lightly done.
FLEA'S CALL: Do you really need me to
tell you how good this looks? I mean, it's not only
flattering, but makes her look younger as well.
Even if this style didn't come at the end of a long
recovery period from horrible cut, I'd still think it was
adorable. Yeah, I know, I can't believe I used
"adorable" either, but, darn it, it fits.
Think of it as the more expressive version of
"cute".
A Second Look
Found a slightly
better picture of COURTNEY COX ARQUETTE's newly layered version of her long
style. As I said before, it's amazing what a
difference a few well placed layers can make, plus they
finally dispel that mental picture of Morticia Adams I
was getting whenever I saw her. And it looks even
better when she lets it go wavy (as you can see on the
cover of this month's "Madmoiselle").
On a more
depressing note, I also happened upon a better photo of ALICIA
SILVERSTONE and her
scraggly-looking brown 'do with the unflattering bangs
that, while not completely awful, does make her look
13. So, I guess "better picture" is
actually a relative term. As I said last month, I'm
really not sure where she is going with this, but
hopefully it's back to the salon. Hmmm...I guess
that would be the kind of catty comment that made some of
you think I was a woman, huh?
Ok, is it me or is SHARON STONE's new "blunt" style (her
description, not mine) look different everytime she
appears in public? Given the fact that she appears
to be keeping her bangs and letting the rest grow, I'm
assuming that her end goal her is a return to a version
of a bob, especially since she is now keeping the nape
very short.

In the meantime,
however, when she styles it the wrong way she bears a
frightening resemblance to Brother Theodore.

How's that for Dennis Miller
reference? =)
Snippets
I have a bit of update news as
a result of the Grammys. First, GLORIA
ESTEFAN seems to have
let her new short cut evolved into a Meg Ryan-ish
choppy bob. And that's not a good thing.
At least the industrial strength dark red color she
is putting on it currently tends to distract you from
just how unflattering the cut is. Or maybe
not v
Second, it appears that pop songstress (Is that really a word, btw?
"Songstress"? When did
"singer" become passé? But I digress)
MONICA has let the super short crop she
adopted a few months ago grow back out a bit.
It's still short, she's now wearing it fuller with
the length appearing to fall to about mid-ear if it
wasn't flipped out. Much better, IMHO, since I
thought the previous cut was too severe on her.
Let's turn to
the good, the bad, and the ugly of blondes.
First the good blonde in the form of GERI
HALLIWELL, the former
Slutty, er, Sexy Spice. Her blonde hair (which
is almost certainly augmented with extensions) now
falls close to waist-length. Though I'm not fan
of hers or extensions (hey, that last part is a
shock, eh?), I really do think this is a good look
for her. I can't really say why, but the extra
long blonde locks just seem to fit v
The bad blonde was ANGELICA
BRIDGES, who
inexplicably traded her trademark red locks for the
generic L.A. blonde look. Either the changes
must have been for a film role or Angelica realized
her mistake, because her long locks are once again a
deep auburn hue. Looks much better and allows
her to regain her uniqueness amongst the B-movie
bimbos. And I mean that in the best possible
way v
And, as much as
it pains me to label her this way, the ugly would be KIRSTIE
ALLEY. I couldn't
ever find a picture when she originally went blonde
about six months or so ago and soon gave up because
it was just old news. However, after running
across the photo at left, I just had to bring it up
again if for no other reason than to say that,
whereas before, it was horrible, it's now long and
horrible. I don't get it. What's wrong
with going back to brunette?
Lauren Holly
picture courtesy The Star; Britney Spears pictures
courtesy Reuters; Charlize Theron pictures courtesy Hollywood.Com and Reuters; Holly
Hunter pictures courtesy The Rosie O'Donnell Show, Reuters, and Hollywood.Com; Courteney Cox Arquette
and Alicia Silverstone pictures courtesy Hollywood.Com; Sharon Stone pictures
courtesy NBC and Reuters; Monica picture courtesy The
Star; Geri Halliwell and Angelica Bridges pictures
courtesy Reuters; Kirstie Alley picture courtesy Hollywood.Com
|